Prediction EnginePYQsPricingBlog Start practising free
Past Paper Solutions

Work, Energy and Power NEET 2012: Stable Equilibrium

NEET 2012 Physics Work, Energy and Power Stable Equilibrium from Potential Energy

By Founder, JEEnius - IIT Kanpur Alumni · Sep 17, 2026 · 4 min read

Hard 2 min target

The potential energy of a particle in a force field is U=Ar2Br, where A and B are positive constants and r is the distance of the particle from the center of the field. For stable equilibrium, the distance of the particle is:

Show answerAnswer

C) 2AB

Explanation

For equilibrium, the force must be zero, so the potential energy should have an extremum.

dUdr=0

Given potential energy:

U=Ar2Br

Differentiate with respect to r:

dUdr=2Ar3+Br2

For equilibrium:

2Ar3+Br2=0

Br2=2Ar3

Br=2A

r=2AB

Now check stability using second derivative:

d2Udr2=6Ar42Br3

At equilibrium, B=2Ar, so:

d2Udr2=6Ar44Ar4

d2Udr2=2Ar4

Since A is positive, this is positive. Therefore, equilibrium is stable.

Answer: 2AB

Watch the full solution, worked step by step.

What is the correct answer to the Work, Energy and Power NEET 2012 equilibrium question?

Option C is correct for the supplied Work, Energy and Power NEET 2012 Physics question: r=2AB

The task is to find the distance from the field centre where a particle has stable equilibrium. Its potential energy is:

U(r)=Ar2Br,A>0,B>0,r>0

The supplied choices are:

The answer needs two checks: zero force establishes equilibrium; positive potential-energy curvature establishes stability. Finding a distance where the potential energy is zero does not establish either condition.

How do you find the equilibrium distance using the first derivative?

Equilibrium requires zero radial force, so the first derivative of potential energy must vanish. Start with the force relation, not the value of potential energy:

Fr=dUdr
Fr=0dUdr=0

Rewrite the fractions as powers before differentiating. This makes the signs easier to track because the second term already carries a minus sign:

U=Ar2Br1

Apply the power rule separately to each term:

ddr(Ar2)=2Ar3
ddr(Br1)=+Br2

The contribution from the second term is positive because the negative coefficient multiplies the negative exponent. Combining the two contributions gives:

dUdr=2Ar3+Br2

Set this equal to zero and move the negative term to the other side:

2Ar3+Br2=0
Br2=2Ar3

Multiplying by the cube of the radial distance is valid because the distance is strictly positive: Br=2A r=2AB

This gives option C, but it does not yet prove stability. A stationary potential-energy value is only an equilibrium candidate: the slope test alone does not tell you whether it is a minimum or a maximum.

How does the second derivative prove that option C is stable?

The second derivative is positive at the candidate distance, proving that the potential energy has a local minimum. Follow the official solution by differentiating the first derivative term by term:

ddr(2Ar3)=6Ar4
ddr(Br2)=2Br3

Combining these terms gives:

d2Udr2=6Ar42Br3

Only at the equilibrium point, the relation already found allows this substitution:

Br=2AB=2Ar

Use it after differentiating, not before. It is a condition at one position, not an identity valid at every distance.

d2Udr2|eq=6Ar44Ar4=2Ar4>0

Both the constant and the radial distance are positive, so the curvature is positive. A small radial displacement raises the potential energy, and the resulting radial force acts back towards equilibrium.

The official two-stage test therefore confirms stable equilibrium at option C:

r=2AB

Why does setting potential energy to zero give option D instead?

Setting potential energy to zero finds a zero-energy position, not an equilibrium position. That wrong physical condition produces option D:

Ar2Br=0
ABr=0r=AB

Check the slope at this distance:

dUdr|r=A/B=2A(A/B)3+B(A/B)2=B3A20

The force is therefore nonzero. This position cannot be an equilibrium point.

Potential energy has an arbitrary reference zero. Adding a constant changes its zero-energy condition but leaves its derivative, force and equilibrium distance unchanged:

U~=U+C,dU~dr=dUdr

A secondary units check rejects two choices, but it cannot replace the derivative test:

[A]=energy×length2,[B]=energy×length
[AB]=length,[BA]=length1

Dimensions cannot distinguish C from D. In your error log, label this mistake “wrong physical condition”:

U=0instead ofdUdr=0

Use NEET Score Improvement: Fix Errors Before Your Next Mock to plan a targeted retry. Start that retry by writing the zero-force condition before doing any algebra.

How can you apply the same test to two related questions?

Use the equilibrium position to calculate energy, but use derivatives to judge stability. These are original practice questions, not verified past-year questions. Attempt each before checking its worked answer.

What is the potential energy at stable equilibrium for the same potential?

The equilibrium energy is negative, but the equilibrium remains stable. Original practice question 1: Find the potential energy at stable equilibrium for:

U=Ar2Br,A>0,B>0,r>0

Substitute the equilibrium distance already established: r=2AB

Ueq=A4A2/B2B2A/B=B24AB22A=B24A

Negative potential energy does not mean instability. Its sign depends on the energy reference; positive curvature establishes stability here.

Where is equilibrium for a quadratic potential, and is it stable?

The equilibrium is stable at the constant force divided by the stiffness. Original practice question 2: A particle moves along the x-axis with the following potential; find its equilibrium position and determine its stability:

U(x)=kx22F0x,k>0,F0>0

Differentiate, set the slope to zero, then check the curvature:

dUdx=kxF0
kxF0=0x=F0k
d2Udx2=k>0

For a worked numerical check, take these values within this original example:

k=4 Nm1,F0=6 N
x=64 m=1.5 m

The curvature is positive:

d2Udx2=4 Nm1>0

For your next attempt, write this sequence before calculating: differentiate potential energy, set its first derivative to zero, then evaluate its second derivative at the candidate position.

Next step: photograph a doubt on NEET JEEnius AI and photograph any question you are stuck on and get a step-by-step solution across Physics, Chemistry and Biology (20 free a month).

Frequently asked questions

What is the answer to the Work, Energy and Power NEET 2012 equilibrium question?

Option C, r = 2A/B, is correct for U(r) = A/r² − B/r with A, B and r positive. Setting dU/dr = 0 gives this distance, and the positive second derivative confirms stable radial equilibrium.

How do you check stable equilibrium from potential energy?

First set the first derivative of potential energy to zero, since force is the negative potential-energy gradient. Then evaluate the second derivative at that position; a positive value confirms a local minimum and stable equilibrium. For U(r) = A/r² − B/r, the curvature at r = 2A/B is 2A/r⁴ > 0.

Why is setting U = 0 wrong for finding equilibrium?

Equilibrium requires zero force, so the correct condition is dU/dr = 0, not U = 0. For U(r) = A/r² − B/r, setting U = 0 gives r = A/B, where the force is nonzero. Changing the reference zero of potential energy does not change the force or equilibrium position.

Can potential energy be negative at stable equilibrium?

Yes; the sign of potential energy depends on the chosen reference and does not establish stability. For U(r) = A/r² − B/r with A and B positive, the energy at stable equilibrium is −B²/(4A). Stability follows from the positive curvature at r = 2A/B.

neet 2012neet physicspotential energystable equilibriumwork energy power

Practise this with NEET JEEnius AI

25 years of NEET-UG PYQs, AI doubt solving, and the 2027 prediction paper.

Start practising free